24th October 2013
Eight major contractors spearhead compensation scheme for blacklisted workers
Almost five years on from the first distressing revelations of the blacklisting scandal, a group of eight of the country’s largest contractors have joined forces in order to establish a compensation scheme for workers affected by the scandal, a move lauded by many in the industry – including this construction software provider!
Major firms including Sir Robert McAlpine, Balfour Beatty and Skanska have accepted liability for their role in the blacklisting scandal, and have extended an olive branch of sorts towards workers whose livelihoods were threatened by the Consulting Association.
The scandal, which first came to light in 2009, revealed details of a blacklist comprised of the names of 3,200 construction industry workers deemed to be ‘left-wing troublemakers’ or active trade union members. Some 44 major contractors paid to access the database, using it to avoid hiring workers that may have proved problematic down the line.
The new compensation scheme, implemented by eight companies (many of which were implicated in the blacklisting scandal) is being used to determine appropriate levels of remuneration for the employees originally included on the database.
It is thought that the compensation could run into ‘hundreds of millions of pounds', but most commentators are agreed that the scheme represents a step forward for the construction industry.
Justin Moule, Managing Director of construction software provider Integrity Software, said, ‘The compensation scheme is a really positive move for the industry, as it provides those workers affected with a fair chance of maintaining a steady livelihood.’
‘No-one deserves to be discriminated against in the workplace, whether for their political views or any other reason.’
Construction industry growth continued through September, with the third quarter of 2013 the industry’s strongest for over three years.
Growth is a great sign for the construction industry and the economy as a whole, but is your construction company prepared to take on more business?
It would seem that it was one problematic contract at North Midland Construction’s building division that dragged the group into debt, despite its rising turnover. What can you learn from their mistakes?